Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Test

HANUMAN..an example to everyone ..who wants to be GOD's MESSENGER, SEVAK OR DEAR FRIEND....shows us ..the WAY ..burn away all that luxurious label of EGO !! Burning of SONE KI LANKA ..is NOT physical geographical LANKA..but the Unpenetratable LANKA within each one , known as AHAMKAR ego ..yes Jealousy And Pride ..these are the real demons living inside unnoticed, until HANUMAN ..the WISDOM WEAPON ..of GOD 's words Enters it and RESCUES you ..Like ..mother SITA the embodiment of COMPASSION was rescued by LORD of LOVE..and DHARMA ..let Dharma be you weapon to destroy this enemy ..inside called EGO .sairam

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Sign Kaliyuga coming to an end

One sign that Kaliyuga is coming to an end.   Shrimad  Bhagavatam 12.2.1 tataś cānu-dinaṁ dharmaḥ satyaṁ śaucaṁ kṣamā dayā kālena balinā rājan naṅkṣyaty āyur balaṁ smṛtiḥ ----- Religion, truthfulness, cleanliness, tolerance, mercy, duration of life, physical strength and memory will all diminish day by day because of the powerful influence of the Age of Kali..... Jai Bhagavan........

Demigod

Pundits say that all the forms of Paramaatma, the forms which Veda/Smriti/Purana/Itihaasa have mentioned should be worshipped. Without their blessing, one can not make any progress. Gita says - Yajante satvikan Devan (17.4). 

Personally, I feel we should not use the word DEMI-GOD. Instead use DEVA or DEVATA. Bhagavan Krishna said in GITA that many worship Devata for immediate benefits ( such as good health, success, wealth, victory, any worldly benefit) and that they will receive that. But all these prayers come to me and I do honor them.

Indirectly, HE does suggest to worship the ISHWARA ( In this case Krishna) than individual Devata. I think whether you worship Devata or Ishwara or both; it has to do with your own spiritual state in life. At the highest level of such advancement, you will worship Ishwara only. 

We use English word God to mean Ishwara. But do not translate Devata as demi God but use Devata word as is. Western religions do not have the concept or understanding of the existence of Devata and their vitol role. Hence no suitable translation. Demi has a negative connotation..... Ji Bhagavan....  

Pitrukarnyam

Loading 166 - 180 of total 6,321 messages  Yahoo Groups  gitatalk is a Public Group with 30062 members. gitatalk Public Group, 30062 members Primary NavigationConversations Photos Files Polls Links About Back View 6163why should we do any pithrukaryam for this departed soul ? SadhakApr 16 Respected moderator, Hare krishna, Pithrukaryam is done for the departed soul. But soul has no birth or death. It is real. When that is the case why should we do any pithrukaryam for this departed soul. I seek respected Sadhaks explanation on this. S.Vaidyanathan ======================= www.swamiramsukhdasji.net www.swamiramsukhdasji.org Next post in topic >> Show all 3 messages in this topic See more posts from Sadhak

Gita on Murti Pooja

Conversations Photos Files Polls Links About Back View 6308What does Gita say about Murti Puja ? SadhakNov 13 7:08 PM गीतामें इस बारेमें क्या बताया है? जब कभी किसी मंदिरमें नयी मूर्ति रखी जाती है तो मूर्तिमें विधि-विधानसे प्राण-प्रतिष्ठा करनेके बाद ही उस मूर्तिकी पूजा की जाती है। हर वर्ष दीपावलीपर बाजारसे नयी बनी लक्ष्मी गणेश की मूर्तियाँ लाकर (उन मूर्तियोंमें विधि-विधानसे प्राण-प्रतिष्ठा किये बिना ही) पूजा करते हैं। मूर्तियोंकी पूजा करनेमें यह भिन्नता क्यों है? गीतामें मूर्तिकी पूजा करनेके लिये क्या नियम बताये हैं? समझाइयेगा। सविनय, साधक What has Gita said about this When ever a new deity is installed at the temple, certain rituals and rites are performed for 'Pran Pratishtha' (invoking God into the deity), and there after puja etc is done. Every year at Diwali, new deities are purchased from the market of Lakshmi - Ganeshji and (without pran-pratishtha, rituals etc) one prays to them. Why the differences in the way the deities are worshipped ? What has Gita said about Murti puja and what methods - restrictions etc. are shown ? Please share, Humbly, Sadhak

Hanuman and Bhagavat Gita

“O King, at that time Arjuna, the son of Pandu, who was seated in his chariot, his flag marked with Hanuman, took up his bow and prepared to shoot his arrows, looking at the sons of Dhritarashtra. O King, Arjuna then spoke to Hrishikesha [Krishna] these words:” (Bhagavad-gita, 1.20)

atha vyavasthitān dṛṣṭvā dhārtarāṣṭrān kapi-dhvajaḥ pravṛtte śastra-sampāte dhanur udyamya pāṇḍavaḥ hṛṣīkeśaṁ tadā vākyam idam āha mahī-pate

Friend1: So I saw an interesting movie the other day.

Friend2: Hollywood or Bollywood?

Friend1: Bollywood.

Friend2: You were able to understand? Did it have subtitles?

Friend1: No subtitles, but I was able to get the general idea of what was going on.

Friend2: Was it good?

Friend1: It was interesting for sure. You can tell they took advantage of the popularity of worship of Shri Hanuman.

Friend2: It was a religious movie?

Friend1: That’s the thing; it wasn’t.

The main character was a self-proclaimed devotee of Hanuman. He would go to temples, make offerings, and recite the Hanuman Chalisa whenever in trouble.

Friend2: I don’t know the Hanuman Chalisa, but every time I hear it I think of Tulsidas. Who could imagine becoming the author of something that famous?

Friend1: This character even paid obeisances to monkeys whenever he saw them.

Friend2: I know what you mean by “self-proclaimed devotee.” They’ll identify as a Hanuman-bhakta, right?

Friend1: Yeah.

Friend2: I never thought anything of that until I came across bhakti-yoga teachings. Apparently, a true bhakta will never identify himself as such.

Friend1: Really?

Friend2: Yeah; they’ll say that they’re trying to become a devotee or that they’re serving a devotee, following in the footsteps. Not a big deal, but I hadn’t heard that before.

Friend1: That is interesting. As you might have guessed, in keeping with the Hanuman theme this movie had the main character travel into a foreign land to do something important.

Friend2: And I bet that something important had nothing to do with God or His message.

Friend1: Bingo. I mean it was a feel-good movie. The Hanuman-bhakta secretly travelling into Muslim-Pakistan in order to reunite a small girl with her family.

She had gotten lost previously and it was a struggle to figure out where she was from.

Friend2: Ah, so they wanted to bring the two faiths together through this story. That’s not a bad message, but not sure why they would need to rely on Hanuman for that.

Friend1: That’s what bothered me. First off, you’re taking Hanuman’s brave journey into Lanka for the sake of Shri Rama, who is God, and comparing it to something material. There is actually no similarity between the two.

If the guy was infiltrating another country to preach the genuine message of Godhead, to serve Him in thought, word and deed, then the comparison would fit.

Friend2: Definitely.  Hanuman crossed the ocean to reach Lanka, where Rama’s wife Sita was being held captive.

Prabhupada sailed across the ocean to give the message of Divine love to those who had been held captive by maya, the illusory energy of this material world.

Friend1: This movie got me to thinking. I’m going to run this by you. Hanuman from the Vedic tradition was used in this movie to equate the Vedas with Islam. For analysis purposes, the exact religion on the other side doesn’t really matter. You can substitute any country and religion and have the same kind of movie.

Friend2: Right. Friend1: So what if things were reversed? Why isn’t there a movie about a devotee of the Hanuman of another religion doing something like this?

Friend2: Not sure what you mean.

Friend1: Well, why not take the devotee of the Hanuman of Islam and have him unite with people from another religion? That could be a good movie too, no?

Friend2: Umm, you’re missing a key point. Friend1: I’m not, but I’m glad you picked up on it. There is no Hanuman of any other tradition, is there? That’s what you were going to say, right?

Friend2: Yup. Not even close.

Friend1: This is how I know that Rama is God. I’m not trying to put down other traditions. This is not a contest of “my religion is better than yours.” God is one. The differences in religion are due to the level of detail in which the Supreme is described. Hanuman is there with Rama. He is known as Rama’s servant. Anyone who is truly devoted to Hanuman accepts Rama as God. More broadly, they accept that the Supreme Lord is a person with identifiable features.

Friend2: The person Hanuman is very specific. This means that the Vedas are very specific. That fact alone removes a lot of the doubt. Friend1: Exactly. So there is no reason to bring Hanuman down to a generic level or equate his actions with materially motivated ones.

Friend2: That’s a given. At least one good thing came of you watching that movie. You got a better appreciation for Shri Hanuman and the Vedic tradition to which he belongs. There is no need to go outside.

The Bhagavata philosophy, so nicely described in the Bhagavata Purana, is purna, or complete. You study the Bhagavad-gita and you learn everything that’s needed to be known.

Even Hanuman is represented; he stands tall in the flag on top of Arjuna’s chariot. In Closing: When Bhagavad-gita to recall in mind, Image of flag of Hanuman to find. Devotee of Rama, strong and brave, To Lanka went for Sita’s hopes to save. Not anywhere else to Hanuman the same, His association only from Vedas to gain. Means that tradition completeness to own, From it know everything needed to be known.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Yudhisthir and Narad

Narada Teaches Yuddhishtra a Householder’s Dharma Once king Yuddhishtra, the eldest of the five Pandavas, was conducting a big Vedic sacrifice. At that opportune moment sage Narada decided to bless the sacrifice with his presence.

Welcoming Narada with all due respect, Yuddhishtra, with folded hands, asked him the following question for the benefit of all humanity: "Oh divine sage!, please explain to me the course of conduct by which a householder like me, who is too much attached to his house and property, can attain moksha easily."

Bhagawan Narada replied: "A person, living the life of a householder, should perform all the karma prescribed for a householder, but offer it to God.

He should also serve great saints and mahatmas. Whenever he gets the time, he should go and live amongst people who have given up worldly life and hear from them stories about the various avatars of God. The companionship of these holy people will have the following effect on the householder:

Like the person who, getting up from a dream, feels no attachment to the objects seen in his dream, similarly, as the householder’s mind becomes purer and purer by satsang with holy men, he will gradually start reducing attachment to his body, wife, children, money etc, because in any case they are one day going to separate from him.

A wise person should serve his body and family only to the extent that is functionally necessary and not more. He should be detached from inside but show attachment outside and behave like an ordinary, typical person. He should, without any attachment, acquiesce to whatever his parents, brothers, children or friends say or want." "A householder, looking for emancipation, should carry out his duties while enjoying what he gets from the heavens (like crops due to rainfall), from the earth (like gold, gems etc), and whatever he gets by fate.

He should understand that all wealth is created by Lord Vishnu and is obtained through His grace only, therefore, he should not hoard the wealth given to him but utilise it in the service of the aforementioned holy men. Remember, man has right over only that much as is necessary for quenching his hunger. The person who lays claim on the surplus wealth is nothing but a thief. He should be punished." "A householder should think of deer, camels, donkeys, monkeys, mice, serpents, birds and flies like his own children and hence these should not be driven out of the house or fields if they enter and begin to eat.

Even though he may be a householder, he should not go through too much trouble to obtain the three purusharthas - dharma, artha and kama.

Rather, he should remain satisfied and make do with whatever he is able to get according to time, place and luck. He should share all objects of enjoyment with everyone, right down to dogs, sinners and people belonging to the lowest strata of society, and only then utilise them for his own use.

What more can I say, even his wife, whom he claims as his own should be deputed to serve guests at home, even at the cost of his own neglect. People lay down their lives for their wives. One is ready to go against one’s own elders for her. Such is the attachment to one’s wife. The man who can remove his attachment from such a wife wins over the great Lord Vishnu, who otherwise is unconquerable. How despicable is this body, which if buried is going to become the food of worms, or excreta if eaten by animals, or reduced to ashes if cremated!

Equally despicable is the body of the wife who contributes to its erotic pleasures! But how great is the infinite soul which pervades even the sky?"

"A grihastha should consume for his personal self only those items which are leftover after he has performed the five daily yajnas (pancha maha yajnas). The wise person, who does not lay claim to the surplus that remains is elevated to the status of saints." "Whatever the householder obtains through his vocation as per his varna-ashrama dharma, with that he should daily worship the gods, rishis, humans, other living beings, his ancestors (pitras) and his inner self. This is nothing but the worship of One God in different forms."

"If the householder has the required means as well the requisite qualifications for performing sacrifices, he should worship God with yajnas like Agnihotra etc. Even though God Himself is the enjoyer of all sacrificial offerings, He is much more satisfied when He is propitiated with rich food, dripping with ghee, offered through the mouths of brahmins, than He is with oblations offered through the sacred fire.

Therefore, you should satisfy all - brahmins, gods, the five yajnas, humans and other creatures. In this way, you will be able to worship all living entities, or in other words, the Supreme God residing inside all living beings."

"If sufficiently rich, the householder should perform according to his means, shraddha, the ritual for their departed parents and ancestors. Since a son is to thus revere his elders even after their death, what to say that he is expected to serve them when they are alive! Actually, having inherited their wealth, the son shows his gratitude to his parents by doing nothing to sully their reputation.

Doing shraddha purifies the mind and helps also to strengthen belief in life after death. One should feed a maximum of three brahmins in shraddha, and however rich a person may be, he should not expand the shraddha too much.

This is because if large scale invitations are given then it becomes difficult to sustain the necessary levels of purity required for the shraddha. Before being offered to the brahmins, the food prepared for shraddha should first be offered to the gods (bhog lagana).

In fact, anytime you divide your food between gods, rishis, pitras, living beings, relatives and one’s own self, these all should be viewed as identical with God, Who resides in all of us." "One who understands the essence of dharma should not serve non vegetarian food, nor eat it at the time of shraddha, for there is no real gratification in the slaughter of animals but there is supreme satisfaction with food which is fit for sages.

Actually, for those who wish to follow the correct course of conduct, there is no higher dharma than abstaining from violence towards all living beings either through mind, word or action."

"It is the duty of householders to indulge in charity on auspicious occasions like makar-sakranti, akshaya-trittya etc, as anything given to the gods, pitras, brahmins, humans on these days bears endless (akshaya) fruit. A householder should also regularly visit places of pilgrimage.

Any virtuous act performed in such places gives a thousandfold fruit." "However, remember one thing, the universe is a big tree with infinite creatures. Its root is Bhagawan Krishna.

Therefore, gratifying Him leads to the gratification of all creatures. Thus, many people worship His idols with great reverence. But those who cultivate hatred towards other humans, their worship remains futile and does not yield any fruit. Even amongst the humans, a brahmin is considered the most deserving of veneration because through his tapasya, studies etc, he bears within himself the Veda, which is nothing but the body of God.

Indeed brahmins, who purify the three worlds with the dust of their feet, are venerated even by the Supreme God Krishna." "The very definition of dharma is that which removes hurdles in the way to a person’s moksha.

The person wishing to follow the path of dharma should steer clear of the five forms of Adharma. These are: 1). Vidharma: It is that which though practiced as dharma, obstructs another person’s dharma.

2). Paradharma: This is when a person follows the dharma prescribed for another varna or ashrama. For example, a brahmin picking up the sword, even when there is no emergency. 3).

Upadharma: This is hypocrisy or performing dharma merely for showing off. 4).

Chhala: Interpreting the shastras (scriptures) otherwise by jugglery of words. 5).

Abhasa: When one resorts to a course of conduct according to one’s own fancy, different from the duties prescribed for one's particular varna and ashrama in the shastras, then it is known as ‘abhasa’, meaning that which given only an ‘impression' of dharma, but is actually not so. Indeed, varna and ashrama have been prescribed by God Krishna Himself, according to our innate natures (Bhagavad Gita 4.13).

When they are followed, they lead to innermost peace." "One who is a dharmatma (follower of dharma), even though he may be poor, should not attempt to earn money either for the sake of his own subsistence or even for performance of dharma. Because the person who ceases from all endeavours for his livelihood, gains to an ‘effortless state’, and it is this very effortless state which takes care of his subsistence, much like the proverbial python whose subsistence carries on without any effort on its part (ajgar-vritti).

How can the happiness enjoyed by a self-contented person who has no desires and delights in his own self, be obtained by a person who is always tormented by one desire or the other and runs hither and thither in the search of money?

Like the person wearing shoes has no fear from thorns and pebbles, similarly for the person who has contentment (santosha) in his heart, there is sukha always and in all places, and no dukha at all. Indeed, a self-satisfied man can be happy by merely getting water to drink. However, one who is driven by desires, especially those of the stomach and the genitals, is reduced to the status of a dog in his own house."

"Yuddhishtra! There are three impediments to a person’s moksha - kama (desire), krodha (anger) and lobha (greed), (Bhagavad Gita 16.21). One should win over kama by practicing restraint; krodha by giving up desires and lobha by recognizing money (artha) to be nothing but a source of trouble (anartha). And finally, one should win over fear by realisation of the Ultimate Truth.

Actually, one can win over all these faults merely by bhakti towards one’s guru. Indeed a guru is a direct manifestation of God Himself, who imparts to man the light of knowledge. But for the person who thinks of the Guru as an ordinary mortal, the hearing of shastras of is as futile as the bath of an elephant (who bathes in water quite thoroughly, but as soon as it comes on the shore it takes some dust from the ground and strews it over its body)."

"The ultimate aim is to cultivate the three types of advaita (oneness) in life. These are: 1). Bhava-Advaita: This is the comprehension of the essential oneness of cause and effect, like thread and cloth. Similarly, any difference between God, who is the cause of the world, and the world is unreal or illusory. 2).

Kriya-Advaita: This is the offering of all actions to God and realising that the mind, word or body, used to accomplish an act, are but mere instruments. 3). Dravya-Advaita: Realizing that one’s own self-interest is not different from one’s wife, children, as well as all living beings.

Finally, Yuddhishtra! For a particular person, the particular material he is allowed to acquire at a particular time by a particular means, as entitled by the shastras, except in emergencies, he should conduct his life according to only those materials. Oh king!

The householder who abides by these duties prescribed in the shastras, eventually attains unity with Bhagawan Krishna." (This story occurs in detail in the Shrimad Bhagavata Purana, 7.14-15).

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Shiv eve's closing

We see many times Lord Shiva his eyes are often closed.   Is he sleeping?  If Bhagavan Shiva is God why appear to be sleeping?   See we live a life is often  often highly distracting. We wish to pursue what we see and are attracted to.   

Eventually  we go after the  negative bad and unhealthy aspects in life. Whether it is temptations to eat unhealthy food or indulge in harmful habits, we do a host of things in life that are not healthy practices for the mind and the body.

The Closed eyes of Bhagavan Shiva teaches us to keep away from that which will hamper out Academic  our Spritual growth.   Those things of life needed  for Spritual  fulfillment.   Hence it teaches us  to engage in right actions and right thoughts. This is a key to perfect health........ Om Namath Shvaya.......

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Dean Teras

Dhanteras is the first day of Diwali Festival as celebrated in India. The festival, known as "Dhanatrayodashi" or "Dhanvantari Trayodashi".

The word Dhan means wealth and Teras means 13th day as per Hindu calendar.

It is celebrated on the thirteenth lunar day of Krishna paksha (dark fortnight) in the Hindu calendar month of Ashwin.

On Dhanteras, Goddess Lakshmi is worshiped to provide prosperity and wellbeing. Dhanteras holds special significance for the business community due to the customary purchases of precious metals on this day.

An ancient legend ascribes the occasion to on interesting story about the 16 year old son of King Hima. His horoscope predicted his death by snake-bite on the fourth day of his marriage.

On that particular day, his newly-wed wife did not allow him to sleep. She laid out all her ornaments and lots of gold and silver coins in a heap at the entrance of the sleeping chamber and lit lamps all over the place. Then she narrated stories and sang songs to keep her husband from falling asleep.

The next day, when Yama, the god of Death, arrived at the prince’s doorstep in the guise of a Serpent, his eyes were dazzled and blinded by the brilliance of the lamps and the jewellery.

Yama could not enter the Prince's chamber, so he climbed on top of the heap of gold coins and sat there the entire night listening to the stories and songs. In the morning, he silently went away.

Thus, the young prince was saved from the clutches of death by the cleverness of his new bride, and the day came to be celebrated as Dhanteras.

The following day came to be called Naraka Chaturdashi ('Naraka' means hell and Chaturdashi means 14th). It is also known as ‘Yamadeepdaan’ as the ladies of the house light earthen lamps or ‘deep’ and these are kept burning throughout the night glorifying Yama, the God of Death.

Saturday, November 7, 2015

The Crow and Pigeon

The crow who become pigeon Once there was a crow that lived near a farm-house. The owner of the farm had kept some pigeons and he fed them with grains regularly.

The crow looked at the pigeons and envied them everyday. Deciding to share the feed, the crow painted his body like that of pigeons and joined the pigeons as one of them. Thus, he was able to enjoy the feed daily. The pigeons never suspected anything foul.

But one day, after the feed, the crow couldn't control himself and started crying. The pigeons came to know that he was not one of them. They pecked at his body so mercilessly that he started bleeding. The crow flew away to save his life and went straight to his own brethren- the crows. But because of his painted body, they refused to accept him.

So, he was forced to flee in order to save himself and became a homeless wanderer.

Moral of the story:

So it is important that we should just be satisfied with whatever the Lord has blessed us and should not pretend or pose to be what we are not. The five rupees in our pocket, is more satisfying than the crores of rupees in another's account.

So we should not burn our hut by thinking about others' palaces. Whether it is hut or palace, everyone in this world has some suffering or the other. The only panacea for all suffering souls is to chant Krishna's names.

So by sincerely doing the same, we will also be able to lead a satisified peaceful life.

In Bhagavad Gita Chapter 12 verse 19, Lord Krishna says,

tulya nindaa stutir mauni /
santushto yena kenachit
aniketah sthira matir /
bhaktimaan me priyo narah

"One who is always silent and satisfied with anything, who doesn't care for any residence, who is fixed in knowledge and who is engaged in devotional service—such a person is very dear to Me."

In the above verse the phrase "santushto yena kenacit" means to be 'satisfied with anything'.

This is a very important quality which we need to imbibe in our lives. We must always be thankful and grateful to Supreme Lord for whatever He has given us and also for whatever He has not given us.

Because Lord knows what we deserve and more importantly as our dear Supreme Father, He very well knows what we need and He blesses us accordingly.

So we should always be satisfied in whatever condition He puts us in. Whatever He does is for our good. But unfortunately we forget these truths and always keep comparing our position with others, become envious and hanker for the same position and become morose in the end when our attempts are not successful.

For an unsatisfied person there is neither peace in this life, nor in the next.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

How Draupadi Was Protected by Krishna’s Grace

How Draupadi Was Protected by Krishna’s Grace.

Sadhguru looks at the situation when the Kauravas attempted to disrobe Draupadi, and explains how Grace functions for those who are receptive.

Sadhguru: Krishna was not present when the Kauravas tried to disrobe Draupadi in public. He was not even aware of the scene because when he was about to go to the Rajasuya Yagna, Shalva, a king who held a grudge against him, came and raided Dwaraka. He and his men killed people and burnt homes, cattle and everything. Those of the Yadavas who managed to escape ran into the forest and hid there. On top of that, Shalva kidnapped Krishna’s father Vasudeva and took him away.

By the time Krishna reached Dwaraka, the whole place was burnt and devastated, and the survivors were all in hiding. When they saw him, they came back down. He organized the reestablishment of the community and the reconstruction of the city and sent his son to go and somehow achieve the release of his kidnapped father. Since he was involved in all this, he was not aware of what was going on in Hastinapur.

If Krishna was not even aware of Draupadi’s predicament, how did he reach out to her? How did this miracle happen that she was guarded? This is a question of Grace.

People constantly ask me this – some gently, some sarcastically, some in an accusing manner – how does Grace work? For Grace to function, I need not be mentally aware of what is happening to you. Through an initiation into a spiritual process, a certain investment of energy has been made, which functions as Grace. If I wish to be aware of what is happening with someone, I can be aware. But most of the time, I do not wish to be aware because too many things are going on. For those who are receptive, Grace works. For those who are not receptive, Grace does not work. Grace becomes accessible and available to you only when you create the necessary openness within you, which means you have to be willing to keep yourself aside. In a similar vein, Udhava once asked Krishna, “In many situations, I have seen beyond any doubt that you are a divine manifestation. There is so much about you which is beyond man. But then how come people are struggling and you cannot handle their problems with a snap of your fingers?” Krishna smilingly said, “No one can work a miracle unless the recipient is in full faith. Even the great Mahadeva cannot work a miracle unless there is receptivity and faith. When people are not receptive, you cannot expect miracles.

” There is a beautiful story: one day, Krishna was having lunch. Satyabhama was serving him. Halfway through the meal, he got up and said, “One of my devotees is in trouble. I need to go.” He washed his hands and went. Just before the gate, he suddenly stopped, turned around, and came back. Satyabhama asked, “You left midway through lunch, saying your devotee is in trouble, but then you turned back. What happened?” Krishna said, “A devotee of mine was chanting, ‘Krishna, Krishna,’ with eyes closed.

A hungry tiger approached him. The man would have gotten killed, so I thought I will reach out and I left. But by the time I was near the gate, the fool had picked up a stone – so I turned back.”

For Grace to function, the person who is the source of that Grace does not need to be mentally aware of the situation. The investment of energy that has been made through the initiation functions by itself. You just have to open up the bounty that has been given to you. Do not think of faith in the sense of how people are talking about miracles – they just lost control over their imagination. In his lifetime, Krishna himself generated faith in lots of people, but still not in adequate measure for who he was.

That has always been so – when the greatest ones came, the greatest things did not happen because they were too far ahead. In a way, medium-scale ones did better because they operated on a level that people understand, but they could not take them to the ultimate. Grace becomes accessible and available to you only when you create the necessary openness within you, which means you have to be willing to keep yourself aside.

If you say “Krishna, Krishna” and pick up a stone, it will not work. Similarly, if you say, “Sadhguru, Sadhguru” and pick up a stone, even if I want to, it will not work because Grace is very subtle. And as already said, it is not at all necessary that the one through which Grace functions is mentally aware of what is happening. That is why though Krishna was not aware of Draupadi’s predicament at that moment, still Grace worked for her.